Whilst supply side economics has taken a temporary back seat at present it will need to return in importance for Australia to shake off the underlying issues that existed prior to the recession. That is the recession we didn't have, although we are still in it. The issues of competition, low savings, underlying inflation due to skills shortage, infrastructure and a appreciation in the $A all will serve to lower our international competitiveness.
Sidenote why is the $A about to appreciate? Well the financial markets are already predicting that by the end of the year our interest rates will have risen by 0.5 and a further 1.0 next year to slow inflation. If you compare our interest rates to the rest of the world there is already a major differential. This means that if our cash rate moves first it will attract investors and speculators, leading to lower returns for our exporters.
So as Gittins has pointed out recently in PM won't be a great leader the Rudd government needs to make some hard decisions and why not now? Politically there is no serious competition and secondly the time is ripe when the economy is in the need of injections. The article points out 5 areas that Rudd has already considered; competition, innovation, skills, infrastructure and tax reform. There is debate whether all of these involve micro reform however there is a need for change.
In light of this as Henderson (Rudd will need reform for recovery) points out that flexibility is key to future growth. It is of particular interest to compare this article to Gittins' No such thing as a free market. to see a contrasting view regarding the direction of labour and financial regulation.
Which one do you believe is the direction Australia should take? It would be great to see some responses to hear your thoughts???
p.s if you are after some more reading on micro policy and another viewpoint check out Mr. Woods (VCE link to your right) in Topic 4- micro and Topic 3- Allocation of resources.
No comments:
Post a Comment